COMPARATIVE OF INTRAARTICULAR INJECTION BETWEEN DEXTROSE PROLOTHERAPY VERSUS TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS

Authors

  • Widodo Mardi Santoso Universitas Brawijaya
  • Andhy Indriyono Universitas Brawijaya
  • Badrul Munir Universitas Brawijaya
  • Alidha Nur Rakhmani Universitas Brawijaya
  • Machlusil Husna Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jphv.2020.001.02.1

Keywords:

Osteoarthritis, Dextrose Prolotherapy, Triamcinolone Acetonide

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common cartilage degenerative disorders that is a major problem because it causes chronic pain and disability. Therefore the method of treatment and prevention of old age is a big challenge. The results of Dextrose Prolotherapy compared to Triamcinolone therapy research are still varied. Objective:  to  compare  the effectiveness  of  Dextrose  Prolotherapy  and  Triamcinolone Acetonide (TA) in the treatment of moderate knee knee OA.True experimental single blind study, at the Neurology Polyclinic Dr. Saiful Anwar General Hospital Malang for 6 months (July-December 2019). Group I; Dextrose Prolotherapy (15%) intraarticularly injected 3 times every 4 weeks and group II; TA one- time intraarticular injection. The parameters studied were The Western Ontario and McMaster  Universities  Osteoarthritis  Index  (WOMAC)  Score,  Numeric  Rating  Scale (NRS), and Range of Motion (ROM), weeks 0, 4, 8, 12 and 24. Forty samples consisted of; the 20 samples of the Dextrose Prolotherapy group consisted of; male: female = 2 (10%): 18 (90%), age 62.4 + 7.28, BMI 25.6 + 3.69 kg / m2, pain duration 22.35 + 20.10 months, history of physiotherapy 40.27 + 20.79 times. Kellgren–Lawrence osteoarthritis severity grade II; 17 (85%), grade III 3 (15%). TA group; male: female = 5 (25%):15 (75%), age 62.5 + 9.02, BMI 28.4 + 5.01 kg/m2, pain duration 15.95 +  16.55  months,  history  of  physiotherapy  34  +  24.87  times.  Kellgren  –  Lawrence osteoarthritis severity grade II; 18 (90%), grade III; 2 (10%). Comparison of NRS at rest Dextrose Prolotherapy vs TA of week 4 (2.60 vs 1.25), week 8 (1.65 vs 1.40), week 12 (0.8 vs 2.05), week 24 (0.75 vs 3.35). Comparison of NRS during activity Dextrose Prolotherapy vs TA week 4 (4.45 vs 3.35), week 8 (3.25 vs 3.55), week 12 (2.55 vs 4.30), week 24 (2.55 vs 5.80). Comparison of ROM flexion Dextrose Prolotherapy vs TA week 4 (127.05° vs 123.60°), week  8  (130.85°  vs  122.95°),  week  12  (130.85°  vs  122.95°),  week  24  (131.05°  vs 122.10°). Comparison of WOMAC score Dextrose Prolotherapy vs TA week 4 (30.05 vs 22.45), week 8 (22.90 vs 23.95), week 12 (19.30 vs 29.05), week 24 (18.95 vs 35.40). Intraarticular Injection Dextrose Prolotherapy is more effective for the long term based on pain scale NRS, WOMAC score and ROM. Whereas short-term TA is more effective than Dextrose Prolotherapy.

Author Biographies

Widodo Mardi Santoso, Universitas Brawijaya

Neurology Department, Medical Faculty, Brawijaya University, Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, Indonesia.

Andhy Indriyono, Universitas Brawijaya

Neurology Department, Medical Faculty, Brawijaya University, Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, Indonesia.

Badrul Munir, Universitas Brawijaya

Neurology Department, Medical Faculty, Brawijaya University, Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, Indonesia.

Alidha Nur Rakhmani, Universitas Brawijaya

Neurology Department, Medical Faculty, Brawijaya University, Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, Indonesia.

Machlusil Husna, Universitas Brawijaya

Neurology Department, Medical Faculty, Brawijaya University, Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, Indonesia.

References

Hochberg MC et al. American College of Rheumatology. Recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res; 2012. 64: 465–474. DOI: 10.1002/acr.21596

Felson DT. The sources of pain in knee osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol; 2005. 17:624–628. DOI: 10.1097/01.bor.0000172800.49120.97

Hochberg MC, Perlmutter DL, Hudson JI. & Altman RD Preferences in the management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: Results of a survey of community-based rheumatologists in the United States. Arthritis Rheum; 1996. 9:170–176. DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(199606)9:3<170::aid-anr1790090304>3.0.co;2-k

Michael JWP, Schlüter-Brust KU & Eysel P. The epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Dtsch. Aerzteblatt Online; 2010. 107. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0152

Toopchizadeh V, Babaei-Ghazani A. & Eftekhar Sadat, B. Efficiency of Action Potential Simulation (APS) therapy in compare to Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in knee osteoarthritis. Life Sci J; 2012. 9:3790–3794. Avalaible from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288617645_Efficiency_of_Action_Potential_Simulation_APS_therapy_in_compare_to_Transcutaneous_Electrical_Nerve_Stimulation_TENS_in_knee_osteoarthritis

Barron MC & Rubin BR. Managing osteoarthritic knee pain. J Am Osteopath. Assoc; 2007. 107, ES21-27. Avalaible from:

https://jaoa.org/article.aspx?articleid=2093546

Cusi M. et al. The use of prolotherapy in the sacroiliac joint. Br J Sports Med; 2010. 44:100–104.

DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.042044

R Joshi. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection for first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol; 2005. 32:1305–6. Avalaible from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15996069/

Toker S, Kilincoglu V, Aksakalli E, Gulcan E & Ozkan K. Short-term results of treatment of tennis elbow with anti-inflammatory drugs alone or in combination with local injection of a corticosteroid and anesthetic mixture. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2008. 42:184–187. DOI: 10.3944/AOTT.2008.184

Rabago D. et al. Hypertonic dekstrosa injections (prolotherapy) for knee osteoarthritis: Results of a single-arm uncontrolled study with 1-year follow- up. J Altern Complement Med; 2012. 18:408–414.

DOI: 10.1089/acm.2011.0030

Hashemi M. et al. The effects of prolotherapy with hypertonic dekstrosa versus prolozone (intraartikular ozone) in patients with knee osteoarthritis; 2015. 5:5–8. DOI: 10.5812/aapm.27585

R Joshi. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection for first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol; 2005. 32:1305–6. Avalaible from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15996069/

Mj, I. et al. Effect of intraartcular steroid injection in addition to physical modalities in osteoarthritis knee; 2014. 23(1):48-54.

Godwin M. & Dawes M. Intra-articular steroid injections for painful knees. 241–248. Avalaible from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15000335/

Eslamian F & Amouzandeh B. Therapeutic effects of prolotherapy with intra-articular dekstrosa injection in patients with moderate knee osteoarthritis : a single- arm study with months follow up; 2015. 35–44 DOI:10.1177/1759720X14566

Downloads

Published

2020-08-25

How to Cite

Santoso, W. M., Indriyono, A., Munir, B., Rakhmani, A. N., & Husna, M. (2020). COMPARATIVE OF INTRAARTICULAR INJECTION BETWEEN DEXTROSE PROLOTHERAPY VERSUS TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS. Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo, 1(2), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jphv.2020.001.02.1

Issue

Section

Articles